The full library in alphabetical order, across every area of law.
A person released from post-order detention is released under an order of supervision. The regulation directs the order to specify conditions, including periodic reporting to a named officer with information given under oath, continued efforts to obtain a travel document and assistance to the agency in obtaining one, and attendance for medical examination where directed. Employment authorization is discretionary and rests on a specific finding.
On request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, section 362(d) directs the court to grant relief from the stay by terminating, annulling, modifying or conditioning it. The grounds are cause, including lack of adequate protection; the combination of no equity in property and no necessity for an effective reorganization; a single asset real estate ground; and a ground for real property subject to a scheme to delay or defraud creditors. Burdens are split by statute.
Under the expedited removal provision an immigration officer both finds inadmissibility and orders removal, with no hearing and no administrative appeal. A supervisory review requirement exists in the regulations but is internal. Judicial review is limited by statute to habeas and to three questions of identity, order and claimed status. The practical openings are the fear referral and the status-claim referral, both of which move the matter to a different decision-maker.
Replevin, called claim and delivery in some states, lets a plaintiff claiming the right to possession of a specific chattel have it seized before judgment. The application must identify the goods, state the basis of the right and their value, and be supported by an undertaking. A noticed hearing on the probable validity of the claim is the default, issue without notice requires defined grounds, and the defendant may regain the goods by posting a bond.
A negative credible fear determination may be reviewed by an immigration judge on request. The statute directs that review be concluded as expeditiously as possible, to the maximum extent practicable within twenty-four hours, and in no case later than seven days after the determination. The hearing is closed unless the applicant waives that protection. The judge may not remand to the asylum officer, and the judge's decision is final and cannot be appealed.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e) applies where electronically stored information that should have been preserved is lost because a party failed to take reasonable steps, and it cannot be restored or replaced through additional discovery. On a finding of prejudice, a court may order measures no greater than necessary to cure it. The severest measures are available only on a separate finding of intent to deprive, and prejudice is not required for those.
Rule 37(e) applies only to electronically stored information. Loss of physical evidence is addressed under a federal court's inherent authority, where the older circuit standards survive and negligence can support measures that would be unavailable for electronic material. State courts run on their own law, which in some states includes a separate tort and in others only evidentiary inferences and discovery sanctions.
State notice statutes depart from the federal model in four directions. California sets coverage at a seventy-five person establishment and counts a mass layoff at fifty separations without any percentage test. New York halves the employer threshold, sets closings at twenty-five and requires ninety days. Maine requires ninety days to a state official before a closing or relocation and imposes severance pay of one week per year of service.
Where direct notice is not feasible, most state statutes permit a substitute consisting of email where addresses are held, a conspicuous posting on the entity's own website, and notification to major statewide media. The gateway is fixed: cost above two hundred fifty thousand dollars, an affected class above five hundred thousand, or insufficient contact information. The federal health rule uses a different gateway entirely, turning on whether contact details fail for ten or more individuals.
Once a preservation duty attaches, automated destruction has to be interrupted at the system level. That means suspending retention policies, disabling disappearing-message timers, halting backup rotation for the relevant period, and stopping the reimaging of devices. The federal rule contains no separate immunity for routine system operation; routine operation is only one factor in deciding whether a party took reasonable steps to preserve.
A plaintiff obtaining a prejudgment writ must post security conditioned on paying the costs and damages the defendant sustains if the writ was improperly obtained. The amount is set by statute in some states and by the court in others. What counts as a wrongful attachment is also statutory: California lists the situations expressly, and New York makes the plaintiff liable where the defendant recovers judgment or it is finally decided that the plaintiff was not entitled to the writ.
Standard fire policy forms bar suit unless commenced within a stated period after inception of the loss: twelve months in California, twenty-four in New York, two years in Minnesota. Wisconsin sets statutory periods and forbids a policy from shortening them, tolls the period while an appraisal is conducted, and bars suit until sixty days after proof of loss. Florida applies a five-year statutory period running from the date of loss.
